This is the standard blog entry that naturally comes after a vlog that talks about
why the writer is still single. This is the mandatory "Don't get me wrong" post, an open letter to the universe that basically says: I'm happily single but that doesn't mean I don't want to fall in love someday!!! This is the
bitchslap! answer to the unspoken assumptions made by the audience that when a girl is single, she is afraid to fall in love again and get hurt, that she has trust issues, that she is jaded, that she thinks of love and relationships as a twisted form of the armageddon,
and that she will kick your ass for thinking that, etc.
When I was about six or seven years old, I read in a magazine that Jared Leto referred to his relationship status as "terminally single". As a child, I thought "Well, that sounds cool. Terminally single." As I grew older, of course, it sounded pathetic. Terminally single, to most people, meant the unattached homo sapiens who are past the early thirties with no foreseeable relationships written in their near future. Terminally single: as though it were a disease and falling in love was the cure. Three years ago, I could have told you that I was terminally in love. It was a disease and being single was the only cure. Since
I am sharing with you this piece, either I am cured or I simply misdiagnosed myself.
I am single. But I don't intend to stay single for the rest of my life. Even if I don't end up married, that wouldn't be such a bad thing either. I believe that both states are paved with equal opportunities for happiness---it's your attitude towards your status that either creates or destroys that happiness.
The point that the greater majority has been missing is that being single doesn't mean a girl hasn't moved on or that she has been traumatized or that she simply won't "put herself out there". With regard to the public notion that a person has only, truly (madly, deeply) moved on if she/he has already found someone new (or is in a new relationship), I would like to say two things: One, rebounding is a shitty possibility; and two, some people find happiness and completion in a myriad of other things and not just in the arms of a lover.
I once watched an interview with a controversial celebrity doctor (who was having relationship problems with a younger lover known for being a womanizer) and she said---something like---her children cannot give her the kind of happiness that she gets out of a relationship. I guess a lot of people have told her to look for happiness in the company of her family, her friends, and most importantly, her own self. But she refuses to even so much as acknowledge the chance of finding fulfillment and bliss without romantic love. She said that it was different, that the happiness she feels when she's in the arms of a man is unlike any other and she cannot feel that same level of joy from her kids. In my head, I was like, dude, you just want to get laid. Apologies for being blunt here. I actually felt sorry for her---because it means that she can never be happy on her own, she will always need a man by her side, she is completely powerless: take away M-E-N and she can't spell the m-e-a-n-i-n-g of life. Screw standards, she needs to get screwed. This leads to the inevitable conclusion that she will get involved with ANY man for as long as she doesn't stay single. Pitiful. A sad, sad case.
Love is a necessity in human life, but romance---romance is optional. I have always seen it as a bonus. I thank God for the life I am living, for the blessings and the happiness He gifts me with everyday. If and when I fall in love, that's an extra gift. That's something that will add to my happiness. It's not what will conjure nirvana, it's not my
only happiness. Romantic love will not create but rather nurture happiness. I learned this the hard way, and it wasn't something I realized overnight. It's taken me years to finally understand and live by what I have learned.
Take a look at the photo above. Yes, I know that Ryan Gosling and Rachel McAdams have long broken up. There's always a chance that they will get back together. There's always a chance for
everything. But whether or not they get back together is not the concern of this blog entry. I would simply like to point out that the photo above is my gauge---my yardstick for the quality of romantic relations.
I wrote as a Facebook status once, "
Kapag single, hindi agad maka-move on?
Hindi pwedeng may standards
muna?"
I mean, seriously. Just because I'm not in a relationship right now doesn't mean I haven't moved on. I simply have standards. McGosling or nothing! And I'm simply okay with being single. Call me
mayabang or what have you, but I don't need a man. I lived through 24 years without one, and when one came along it changed my life but a breakup doesn't equal the apocalypse, and it certainly doesn't mean that I will have to find someone to take that person's place, that I suddenly cannot live without a lover. Do I want one in the future? Sure. But I don't want one, I want The One.
It would be nice to fall in love again. I look forward to it. But I look forward to it with eyes wide open---I have been hurt, I have been traumatized but that doesn't mean I'll stop loving. Sometimes, two people just really don't belong together and can't make the relationship work. But that doesn't mean they don't belong to someone else out there whom they can work everything out with perfectly. I look forward to falling in love with a renewed sense of
kilig, with somewhat fresh but knowledgeable perceptions about relationships. Let's just say that, right now, both my heart and my eyes are open. :)
An email exchange with a very smart lady (whom I will name only if she permits me to! hahahaha!) bolstered my beliefs about all this... she told me she understood my views on being single. That she, too, did not want to be in a relationship just for the sake of having one, for a label. She wants a love that's
makabagbag-damdamin.
I want the same thing. I want mad, passionate love all through out. I want sacred moments over breakfast, I want random hand kisses, and feeding each other pie, and kissing each other just because... McGosling or nothing! I don't want a relationship that has a "honeymoon period" where the succeeding months will be filled with complacent moments of a lackluster love. I want a lifetime of honeymoon. I want fire---still balanced by quiet moments of movie marathons and library dates, intelligent conversations and useless debates. I want burning love that lights up the boring moments. I want to waste time just laughing over jokes, kissing in the rain, lying on the hood of the car while eating ice cream and gazing at the constellations of conjugal dreams and life plans.
Okay, now it's even more apparent to you why I am STILL single. =)))))))
Kidding aside though, life is short. If I'm going to waste time with love, then that love has got to be phenomenal. It has to be made of pure awesomeness that ---- in the unfortunate event that doesn't last a lifetime ---- I will look back thinking that the time wasted was worth it, every freakn second of it.
But if it DOES last, well... there's really not much to say except..... it was worth the wait, wasn't it? All the goddarn Disney couples would be so jealous of our ever after, and even the unparalleled McGosling love affair will be put to shame. ;-)